This post isn’t really about abortion, but it might seem like that for a second. Stay with me.
I remember talking to my mom, when I was about ten years old, telling her a load of bull about something I learned from a friend. I bet she saw right through that, because I had no idea what I was talking about, and it must’ve been obvious. We all have an inherent crap radar, right? We know when someone is being fake, or making something up about their life, but can we tell the difference between facts and stories?
While waiting in line at a coffee shop yesterday with a friend, we ran into some guys she knows. They were having a conversation about birth control. One of the guys was talking about how some people don’t believe in birth control and that if he married someone like that, he would start putting the pill in her food, or crushing it into a drink. Let’s not get into the deception aspect of all this. I blew that comment off, but it was quickly followed by this: “Actually, instead I should just give her the morning after pill every three days.”
My friend Bekah started in telling him that the morning after pill causes abortions. I stayed out of it at this point because she was taking care of it and I didn’t really know him that well. The only thing I added was why it’s an abortion (and that is because conception can already have taken place and by preventing implantation, you kill the embryo, which is a human being with all it’s chromosomes). Until this came up: “I don’t believe a baby is alive until it can feel pain, so it’s not an abortion.” Oh man, he about got punched in the face. Bekah just started telling him he was wrong, and he just needed to walk away. I would love to have a legit conversation with him and ask him if he’d ever even taken a biology class.
That is the saddest excuse I may have ever heard, aside from the time of birth, for when life begins. I personally am convinced there is no other time for life to begin than conception, which I won’t go into detail explaining, but most biologists and books agree, unless they are pro-choice, in which case I see a lot of twisting of scientific facts. Anyway, there is only one really logical choice and that is conception. But if you do not believe it’s conception, then logically, there is only one other option. I don’t want to go into this, but basically I think it would be the time both the heart are beating and brain waves are emitted. Again, not my opinion, but the only other option that I could see being anywhere near logical.
I’m rambling.
The point of this story is not abortion, but rather the ignorance behind his comments. It amazes me how people can have such a strong opinion on something they know nothing about. I tend to not have an opinion on something until I have both sides of the argument and I know a decent amount of information. Human life is something I know a great deal about. I have studied both sides of the argument, and how we came into existence. I don’t claim to be pro-life because my parents are pro-life, because someone I looked up to told me what to believe, or even because I follow Christ. I am pro-life because I don’t think there could be another option after looking at life developments facts and using my brain.
The things I don’t know anything about are basically the only thing I will not argue about. I like to have debates, and I like winning. But I only enter into debates I know I can win, because I know a lot about it. It amazed me that he could be so sure of something he knew really nothing about. Had he ever read a biology book? I would bet that he didn’t get an A in health class.
I actually started thinking about this because of the debate between creationism and evolution that popped up in my Facebook newsfeed. There were just ignorant comments flying, from both sides. People who thought they knew what they were talking about, but in reality they had nothing to back it up. I was actually kind of upset that all the creationists could say was that the Bible says so, so it must be true. That’s great guys, because there isn’t any factual evidence to back it up or anything. Evolutionists were claiming there was much more scientific evidence for evolution and creationism has none. You know what’s wrong with the theory of evolution? It’s being treated as if they have evidence, making it truth, but really, all it is is a theory, just like creationism. I would say that the problem with the missing link, is that it’s MISSING. Personally, I think macroevolution is crazy, but microevolution is necessary.
Why are people arguing that something with no evidence behind it is factual? It’s the only thing that people know that doesn’t involve a God they have to submit to. Why is it that people are taking others’ word for it when they tell them we came from monkeys, but when someone tells them the paint is wet, they have to double check? People don’t have free thought anymore, instead they choose to form opinions and beliefs based on what others tell them, rather than drawing their own conclusions and investigating truth for themselves. Ignorance may be bliss, however it won’t be a valid excuse come Judgement day.
I don’t know a lot about a lot of things, but this I know for sure. If you ask God for wisdom, it will be given to you, generously, without finding fault. (James 1:5) That has proven true in my life, and I believe I have been given wisdom, especially in reference to specific areas.
This all baffles me. Know before you speak. I’m guilty of this, but I am working on it every second of my life.
“The more one learns, the more one sees one’s ignorance.” — Chinese proverb